Comparison
Sigmint vs HTMLsig
HTMLsig focuses on straightforward, good-looking HTML signatures without a lot of extras. It runs on a subscription and hosts your signature, including its images, on its service so they display in your emails. That hosting keeps things simple but ties your signature to an ongoing account.
Try Sigmint free →The short answer
Yes for individuals: Sigmint produces the same kind of table-based HTML signature without an account, and its output is yours permanently — there is no hosted dependency that stops working if a subscription lapses. htmlsig suits people who want signatures hosted and managed in a dashboard.
Sigmint vs HTMLsig at a glance
Last verified: 2026-08-25
| Sigmint | HTMLsig | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free, with an optional one-time $12 Pro unlock (lifetime — not a subscription) | Subscription, typically priced per signature or seat, monthly or annual |
| What you’ll pay | $0 — or $12 once, ever | Recurring while your signatures stay active |
| Account required | None. There is no account to create | Yes — signatures are managed through an account |
| Branding on free tier | Small “Made with Sigmint” line on free signatures; removed with Pro | Limits and branding on the free tier |
| Where your data lives | Never leaves your browser — nothing is stored on our servers | Hosted through their service |
| Outlook approach | Bulletproof table HTML with inline styles, machine-checked on every deploy | Copy-paste installation |
| Support | Email the developer directly (hello@sigmint.app) — a human answers, not a ticket queue | Email/help-desk support |
| Refund policy | 14-day money-back guarantee, no questions asked | Per their subscription terms |
Pricing
A recurring subscription per signature, whereas Sigmint charges once with no renewal.
Signup required
You create an account and your signature is hosted by HTMLsig; Sigmint needs no account.
Data privacy
Signature details and images are hosted on HTMLsig's servers, while Sigmint renders client-side and doesn't host your data.
Simplicity
Both keep things clean and minimal rather than loading up on features, with Sigmint bundling four templates.
Outlook rendering
Both target Outlook, Gmail, and Apple Mail, and Sigmint's templates are built for Outlook-safe copy-paste.
When HTMLsig is the better choice
- → You manage several signatures for clients and want them hosted and editable in one dashboard.
Support you can actually reach
Sigmint is a small tool, and that is a support feature: when you email hello@sigmint.app, the person who wrote the code reads it — there is no ticket tier, no chatbot maze, and no “business hours in another timezone”. If something doesn’t work, it gets fixed or you get your money back under the 14-day no-questions refund policy. With platform products, support quality usually depends on which plan you bought.
The verdict
HTMLsig suits people who want a tidy hosted signature and don't mind a subscription. Sigmint fits those who'd rather own their signature outright with a one-time payment and no hosting dependency.
Frequently asked questions
Is Sigmint a good htmlsig alternative?
Yes for individuals: Sigmint produces the same kind of table-based HTML signature without an account, and its output is yours permanently — there is no hosted dependency that stops working if a subscription lapses. htmlsig suits people who want signatures hosted and managed in a dashboard.
Do I keep my signature if I stop paying htmlsig?
htmlsig manages signatures through your account on a subscription model, so access follows the plan. Sigmint hands you the raw HTML outright — copy it once and it is yours forever, no account and nothing to expire.
Which renders better in Outlook, htmlsig or Sigmint?
Both generate table-based HTML aimed at Outlook. Sigmint additionally machine-checks every template on every deploy for the constraints Outlook’s Word engine imposes — nested tables, inline styles only, no style blocks — so a regression cannot ship silently.
More comparisons
Want the whole field in one place? Read the full roundup — or see how we verify that every template renders in Outlook, Gmail and Apple Mail.